Align the load basis
Confirm every proposal uses the same current and future loads, property context and assessment documents.
Proposal normalizer
Compare load basis, selected option, equipment, utility work, permits, access, outage, restoration, changes and closeout.
Decision file
Confirm every proposal uses the same current and future loads, property context and assessment documents.
Separate panel replacement, service upgrade, load management, EV distribution and related work.
Record model, rating, spaces, listed accessories, controls, compatibility and substitutions.
Compare fees, applications, inspections, outage planning, customer prerequisites and schedule dependencies.
Include electrical-room access, trench or route work, fire stopping, patching, labels and cleanup.
Require written change basis, inspection evidence, settings, labels, test records and owner documentation.
Issue the same load inventory, calculation revision, service evidence and future-project queue to each proposer. Record any alternative assumptions before comparing panel, management or service prices, because unlike calculations create unlike scopes.
List exact panel, breakers, disconnects, management devices, charger interfaces, meter equipment, conductors, labels and settings plus access, trenching, fire stopping and finish repairs. Require written compatibility and substitution review.
Itemize permit, inspection, BC Hydro, City or strata steps, fees, prerequisites and schedule assumptions. Closeout should contain labels, settings, tests, inspection records, utility completion evidence, manuals and an updated capacity record.
Issue one calculation, service-evidence set and future-project queue, then compare exact panel, service, management, EV and distribution equipment; utility and permit steps; access, outage, fire stopping and finish repair; and tests, settings and records. State every model, allowance, alternate and exclusion. Define evidence, written notice, pricing and authorization for changed conditions. Carry accepted clarifications into the contract. The resulting schedule should expose proposals based on different load assumptions or restoration boundaries and should never reduce a capacity project to a cost-per-ampere comparison. Conduct a final scope meeting against the one-line drawing and calculation, recording every owner, utility and contractor handoff. Add agreed answers to the accepted proposal before ordering equipment or booking an outage.
Primary references
Links checked in the approved research packet on August 26, 2026. Applicability still depends on the property and proposed scope.